Testing & Quality Specifications
Status: Comprehensive Testing Strategy
Verified: Industry best practices validated
Executive Summary
Build quality into every line of code through a comprehensive testing strategy that balances speed with thoroughness. This specification defines NudgeCampaign's approach to quality assurance, ensuring we deliver a reliable, performant email marketing platform that users can trust with their business-critical communications.
Testing Philosophy
| Principle | Implementation | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| πΊ Testing Pyramid | 70% unit, 20% integration, 10% E2E | Fast feedback, low cost |
| Automation First | 90% automated test coverage | Consistent quality |
| Shift Left | Testing starts with design | Prevent vs. detect |
| Data-Driven | Metrics guide decisions | Continuous improvement |
| Accessibility | WCAG 2.1 AA compliance | Inclusive design |
Testing Strategy Overview
Section 1: Test Strategy Overview (800 words)
Comprehensive Testing Approach
NudgeCampaign's testing strategy implements the proven testing pyramid model, emphasizing fast, reliable unit tests at the foundation while maintaining critical end-to-end coverage. Our approach learns from industry leaders while avoiding the over-engineering that makes competitors' platforms fragile and slow to iterate.
Balanced testing pyramid optimized for speed and coverage
Test Coverage Goals
Testing Lifecycle Integration
| Phase | Testing Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Test case design, accessibility review | Test plans, scenarios |
| Development | TDD, unit testing, code review | Unit tests, coverage reports |
| Integration | API testing, component testing | Integration test suite |
| Staging | E2E testing, performance testing | Test reports, metrics |
| Production | Monitoring, A/B testing | Real-user metrics |
Testing Tools Stack
Development Testing
- Jest: JavaScript unit testing with excellent DX
- React Testing Library: Component testing focused on user behavior
- Supertest: API endpoint testing with Express integration
- Cypress: Modern E2E testing with visual debugging
CI/CD Integration
- GitHub Actions: Automated test execution on every PR
- CircleCI: Parallel test execution for speed
- Codecov: Coverage tracking and reporting
- Percy: Visual regression testing
Performance & Security
- k6: Load testing with JavaScript scripting
- Lighthouse CI: Performance metrics tracking
- OWASP ZAP: Security vulnerability scanning
- Snyk: Dependency vulnerability monitoring
Quality Metrics Dashboard
Real-time quality metrics driving continuous improvement
Risk-Based Testing Approach
Continuous Testing Pipeline
# Example CI/CD test pipeline
stages:
- name: Quick Tests
parallel: true
jobs:
- unit-tests
- lint-check
- type-check
timeout: 5m
- name: Integration Tests
jobs:
- api-tests
- component-tests
timeout: 10m
- name: E2E Tests
jobs:
- critical-paths
- smoke-tests
timeout: 20m
- name: Quality Gates
jobs:
- coverage-check
- performance-baseline
- security-scan
Testing Best Practices
- Test Independence: Each test runs in isolation
- Fast Feedback: Unit tests complete in <5 seconds
- Descriptive Names: Test names describe behavior
- Arrange-Act-Assert: Consistent test structure
- Test Data Management: Factories for consistent data
- Parallel Execution: Maximize CI/CD efficiency
Section 2: Unit Test Requirements (700 words)
Unit Testing Standards
Unit tests form the foundation of our quality pyramid, providing fast feedback and enabling confident refactoring. Our standards emphasize clarity, maintainability, and comprehensive coverage of business logic.
Coverage Requirements
| Component Type | Coverage Target | Critical Functions |
|---|---|---|
| Business Logic | 95% | Email validation, segmentation |
| API Controllers | 90% | Request handling, validation |
| Data Models | 85% | CRUD operations, relationships |
| Utilities | 100% | Shared functions, helpers |
| React Components | 85% | User interactions, rendering |
Unit Test Structure
// Example: Email validation unit test
describe('EmailValidator', () => {
describe('validateEmail', () => {
it('should accept valid email formats', () => {
// Arrange
const validEmails = [
'user@example.com',
'user+tag@example.com',
'user.name@example.co.uk'
];
// Act & Assert
validEmails.forEach(email => {
expect(EmailValidator.validate(email)).toBe(true);
});
});
it('should reject invalid email formats', () => {
// Arrange
const invalidEmails = [
'notanemail',
'@example.com',
'user@',
'user..name@example.com'
];
// Act & Assert
invalidEmails.forEach(email => {
expect(EmailValidator.validate(email)).toBe(false);
});
});
it('should handle edge cases gracefully', () => {
expect(EmailValidator.validate(null)).toBe(false);
expect(EmailValidator.validate(undefined)).toBe(false);
expect(EmailValidator.validate('')).toBe(false);
});
});
});
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Component Testing Strategy
Comprehensive component test coverage
React Component Testing
// Example: Email editor component test
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import EmailEditor from './EmailEditor';
describe('EmailEditor', () => {
it('should allow drag and drop of content blocks', async () => {
// Arrange
const onSave = jest.fn();
render(<EmailEditor onSave={onSave} />);
// Act
const textBlock = screen.getByText('Text Block');
const canvas = screen.getByTestId('editor-canvas');
fireEvent.dragStart(textBlock);
fireEvent.drop(canvas);
// Assert
expect(screen.getByRole('textbox')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('Click to edit text')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('should validate email before saving', async () => {
// Test implementation
});
});
Mocking Strategies
| Dependency | Mock Strategy | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Database | In-memory mock | Jest mocks |
| External APIs | Response stubs | MSW |
| File System | Virtual FS | memfs |
| Time/Dates | Fixed time | jest.useFakeTimers |
| Random Values | Seeded random | seedrandom |
Unit Test Metrics
- Execution Time: < 5 seconds for entire suite
- Flakiness Rate: < 0.1% false failures
- Coverage Growth: +2% per sprint minimum
- Test-to-Code Ratio: 1.5:1 for critical paths
Section 3: Integration Test Scenarios (700 words)
API Integration Testing
Integration tests verify that components work together correctly, focusing on API contracts, database interactions, and service communications. Our approach emphasizes realistic scenarios while maintaining test isolation.
Comprehensive API test coverage ensuring reliability
API Test Categories
Integration Test Patterns
Database Integration Tests
// Example: Contact management integration test
describe('Contact API Integration', () => {
let app, db;
beforeAll(async () => {
db = await setupTestDatabase();
app = await createApp(db);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await db.close();
});
describe('POST /api/v1/contacts', () => {
it('should create contact with valid data', async () => {
// Arrange
const contactData = {
email: 'test@example.com',
firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe',
tags: ['customer', 'vip']
};
// Act
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/contacts')
.set('Authorization', 'Bearer valid-token')
.send(contactData);
// Assert
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body.data).toMatchObject({
email: contactData.email,
firstName: contactData.firstName,
tags: expect.arrayContaining(['customer', 'vip'])
});
// Verify database state
const saved = await db.contacts.findByEmail(contactData.email);
expect(saved).toBeDefined();
expect(saved.tags).toEqual(['customer', 'vip']);
});
it('should handle duplicate emails gracefully', async () => {
// Test implementation
});
});
});
Service Integration Testing
| Service | Test Scenarios | Mock Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| SendGrid | Email delivery, bounce handling | API response mocks |
| Stripe | Payment processing, webhooks | Stripe test mode |
| Shopify | Product sync, customer import | Webhook simulators |
| Redis | Cache operations, sessions | Redis mock |
Contract Testing
# Example: OpenAPI contract test
openapi: 3.0.0
paths:
/api/v1/campaigns:
post:
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: object
required: [name, subject, content]
properties:
name:
type: string
minLength: 1
maxLength: 255
subject:
type: string
maxLength: 150
responses:
201:
description: Campaign created
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/Campaign'
Test Data Management
// Test data factories
class ContactFactory {
static build(overrides = {}) {
return {
email: faker.internet.email(),
firstName: faker.name.firstName(),
lastName: faker.name.lastName(),
status: 'active',
customFields: {},
tags: [],
...overrides
};
}
static buildList(count, overrides = {}) {
return Array.from({ length: count }, () =>
this.build(overrides)
);
}
}
// Usage in tests
const contacts = ContactFactory.buildList(10, { status: 'active' });
Section 4: E2E Test Specifications (700 words)
End-to-End Testing Strategy
E2E tests validate complete user workflows, ensuring all components work together seamlessly. These tests focus on critical user journeys that directly impact business value, running in environments that closely mirror production.
Critical user journeys covered by E2E tests
Critical User Journeys
E2E Test Implementation
// Example: Complete campaign creation flow
describe('Campaign Creation E2E', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
cy.login('test@example.com', 'password');
cy.visit('/campaigns');
});
it('should create and send campaign successfully', () => {
// Step 1: Start campaign creation
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /create campaign/i }).click();
// Step 2: Fill campaign details
cy.findByLabelText(/campaign name/i).type('Summer Sale 2025');
cy.findByLabelText(/subject line/i).type('50% Off Everything!');
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /next/i }).click();
// Step 3: Design email
cy.findByTestId('email-editor').within(() => {
// Drag text block
cy.findByText('Text Block').drag('[data-testid="canvas"]');
cy.findByRole('textbox').type('Amazing summer deals!');
// Add button
cy.findByText('Button Block').drag('[data-testid="canvas"]');
cy.findByPlaceholderText('Button text').type('Shop Now');
cy.findByPlaceholderText('Button URL').type('https://example.com');
});
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /next/i }).click();
// Step 4: Select recipients
cy.findByLabelText(/all subscribers/i).check();
cy.findByText('2,543 recipients').should('be.visible');
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /next/i }).click();
// Step 5: Review and send
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /send test/i }).click();
cy.findByLabelText(/test email/i).type('qa@example.com');
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /send test email/i }).click();
// Verify test email sent
cy.findByText(/test email sent/i).should('be.visible');
// Send campaign
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /send campaign/i }).click();
cy.findByRole('button', { name: /confirm send/i }).click();
// Verify success
cy.findByText(/campaign sent successfully/i).should('be.visible');
cy.url().should('include', '/campaigns/');
});
});
E2E Test Coverage Matrix
| User Journey | Priority | Execution Time | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| New User Onboarding | P0 | 2 min | Every build |
| Campaign Creation | P0 | 3 min | Every build |
| Contact Import | P0 | 2 min | Every build |
| Automation Setup | P1 | 4 min | Hourly |
| Billing Upgrade | P1 | 2 min | Daily |
| Team Collaboration | P2 | 3 min | Daily |
Cross-Browser Testing
Browser coverage matrix
Mobile testing devices
E2E Test Environment
# E2E test environment configuration
e2e:
baseUrl: https://staging.nudgecampaign.com
testData:
users:
- email: e2e-user-1@test.com
plan: professional
- email: e2e-user-2@test.com
plan: starter
browser:
viewportWidth: 1280
viewportHeight: 720
video: true
retries:
runMode: 2
openMode: 0
Section 5: Performance Test Plans (600 words)
Performance Testing Strategy
Performance testing ensures NudgeCampaign delivers fast, responsive experiences even under peak load. Our approach focuses on real-world usage patterns, identifying bottlenecks before they impact users.
Real-time performance monitoring during load tests
Performance Benchmarks
Load Test Scenarios
// k6 load test script
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';
export let options = {
stages: [
{ duration: '2m', target: 100 }, // Ramp up
{ duration: '5m', target: 100 }, // Stay at 100 users
{ duration: '2m', target: 500 }, // Spike to 500
{ duration: '5m', target: 500 }, // Stay at 500
{ duration: '2m', target: 0 }, // Ramp down
],
thresholds: {
http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'], // 95% of requests under 200ms
http_req_failed: ['rate<0.1'], // Error rate under 10%
},
};
export default function() {
// Scenario: Create and send campaign
let loginRes = http.post(`${__ENV.BASE_URL}/api/v1/auth/login`, {
email: 'loadtest@example.com',
password: 'password123'
});
check(loginRes, {
'login successful': (r) => r.status === 200,
});
let token = loginRes.json('token');
let params = { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${token}` } };
// Create campaign
let campaignRes = http.post(
`${__ENV.BASE_URL}/api/v1/campaigns`,
JSON.stringify({
name: `Load Test ${Date.now()}`,
subject: 'Test Campaign',
content: '<h1>Test</h1>'
}),
params
);
check(campaignRes, {
'campaign created': (r) => r.status === 201,
'response time OK': (r) => r.timings.duration < 200,
});
sleep(1);
}
Performance Monitoring
| Metric | Tool | Alert Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Response Time | DataDog APM | >500ms p95 |
| Error Rate | Sentry | >1% errors |
| CPU Usage | CloudWatch | >80% sustained |
| Memory Usage | CloudWatch | >90% |
| Database Queries | pgBadger | >100ms |
Stress Test Scenarios
- Campaign Send Surge: 50 concurrent campaigns, 1M recipients
- Import Stress: 100k contact CSV import
- Analytics Load: 1000 users viewing real-time stats
- API Burst: 10k requests/second spike
Section 6: Security Test Requirements (500 words)
Security Testing Framework
Security testing protects user data and maintains platform integrity through comprehensive vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. Our approach combines automated scanning with manual security reviews.
Continuous security monitoring and vulnerability management
Security Test Categories
Security Test Implementation
// Example: Authentication security tests
describe('Authentication Security', () => {
it('should enforce password complexity', async () => {
const weakPasswords = [
'password', '12345678', 'qwerty123', 'Password1'
];
for (const password of weakPasswords) {
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/auth/register')
.send({ email: 'test@example.com', password });
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
expect(response.body.error).toContain('password requirements');
}
});
it('should prevent brute force attacks', async () => {
// Make 5 failed login attempts
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/auth/login')
.send({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' });
}
// 6th attempt should be blocked
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/auth/login')
.send({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'correct' });
expect(response.status).toBe(429);
expect(response.body.error).toContain('Too many attempts');
});
});
Security Checklist
| Area | Test Coverage | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| API Security | All endpoints tested | Every release |
| Auth Flows | OAuth, JWT, sessions | Weekly |
| Data Encryption | At rest & in transit | Monthly |
| Dependencies | CVE scanning | Daily |
| Infrastructure | Penetration testing | Quarterly |
Vulnerability Management
- Automated Scanning: Daily OWASP ZAP and Snyk scans
- Manual Review: Quarterly penetration testing
- Dependency Updates: Weekly security patches
- Incident Response: 4-hour SLA for critical vulnerabilities
Conclusion
Quality is not an afterthought but a fundamental aspect of NudgeCampaign's development process. This comprehensive testing strategy ensures we deliver a reliable, secure, and performant platform that users can trust with their business-critical email marketing.
Next Steps
- Review Migration Specifications for competitor transition testing
- Explore Performance Specifications for detailed benchmarks
- Study Compliance Specifications for regulatory testing
This testing specification ensures every feature we ship meets the highest quality standards, building user trust from the first interaction.